JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 5, 1992

T-407 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Simon Rodriguez Rodriguez

✓Claimant Maria Helena Casas Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Trabajo. Horario De Trabajo. Liceo Frances. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución:
  2. FALLA :
  3. Primero. Confirmar las siguientes sentencias: Del Juzgado 11 de Instrucción Criminal de Santafé de Bogotá de 13 de enero de 1992. Del Juzgado 3o. de Instrucción Criminal de Santafé de Bogotá de 9 de enero de 1992. Del Juzgado 29 de Instrucción Criminal de Santafé de Bogotá de 7 de enero de 1992. Del Juzgado 10o. de Instrucción Criminal de Santafé de Bogotá de 3 de enero de 1992. Del Juzgado 15 de Instrucción Criminal Santafé de Bogotá de 10 de enero de 1992. Del Juzgado 48 de Instrucción Criminal de Santafé de Bogotá de 13 de enero de 1992, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva.
  4. Segundo. Comuníquese a los Juzgados 11, 3o., 29, 10o., 15 y 48 de Instrucción Criminal de Santafé de Bogotá, la presente decisión para que sea notificada a las partes conforme a lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentCiro Angarita Baron
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.