JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 3, 1992

T-403 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Euclides Sierra

✓
Topic · hard data
Libertad De Cultos. Libertad De Expresion. Equipo De Ampliacion. Iglesia Evangelica. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (8 points)
  1. R E S U E L V E
  2. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la decisión de tutela proferida por el Juzgado
  3. Primero. Civil Municipal de Barbosa (Santander) de fecha seis (6) de febrero de mil novecientos noventa y dos (1992) en el proceso de la referencia.
  4. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR al Juez
  5. Primero. Civil Municipal de Barbosa (Santander) que proceda a determinar si en el barrio Gaitán del municipio de Barbosa, Santander, hay lugar a considerar la existencia de un foro público para el fin divulgativo religioso materia de esta sentencia o, en caso contrario, conceder la oportunidad al señor EUCLIDES ALVARO SIERRA HERNANDEZ para que proceda a efectuar la convocatoria correspondiente conforme a lo establecido en la parte motiva de la sentencia.
  6. TERCERO. ORDENAR a la Alcaldía Municipal y a la Inspección Departamental Permanente de Policía de Barbosa, Santander, el acatamiento estricto a lo decidido por el Juez
  7. Primero. Civil Municipal de la misma ciudad en cumplimiento de lo ordenado por esta Corte
  8. CUARTO. LIBRESE por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991 para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.