JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 20, 1997

T-395 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Carlos Bell Lemus

✓
Topic · hard data
Inconformidad Con Los Requisitos Para Acceder A Una Beca.Medio De Defensa Judicial. Edad Como Factor Que Limita Ciertas Actividades. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Edad
  • Factor que fija límites para acceder a determinadas actividades
Concurso Publico
  • Inconformidad por requisito de edad para becas
Derecho A La Educación
  • Límite de edad para acceder a beca en el exterior
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Inconformidad con requisitos de convocatoria pública para beca
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR las Sentencias proferidas por el h. Tribunal Administrativo del Atlantico, el trece (13) de febrero de 1997, y por el Consejo de Estado, el tres (3) de abril del mismo ano, en relacion con la accion de tutela instaurada por el senor Carlos Bell Lemus.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR que por la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, se comunique esta providencia el h. Tribunal Administrativo del Atlantico, en la forma y para los efectos previstos en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Notifiquese, copiese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.