JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 20, 1996

T-463 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Milena Tinoco Tolosa

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Igualdad. Libre Desarrollo De La Personalidad. Discriminacion Por Estatura Para Ingresar Al Ejercito. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Igualdad
  • Exclusión formación académica por estatura
Ingreso A Programa Academico
  • Razonabilidad y proporcionalidad de requisitos
Juez De Tutela
  • Protección derechos no invocados
Demanda De Tutela
  • Naturaleza
  • No limita protección de otros derechos
Principio De La Buena Fe
  • Obliga a la fuerza pública
6 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR en todas sus partes la sentencia proferida en segunda instancia por la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bucaramanga el 13 de mayo de 1996, en el caso de la acción de tutela instaurada por MILENA TINOCO TOLOSA.
  2. Segundo. SE CONFIRMA el fallo de primera instancia, proferido el 21 de marzo de 1996 por el Juzgado Civil del Circuito Especializado Provisional de Bucaramanga.
  3. Tercero. El Juzgado de primera instancia verificará el cabal cumplimiento de lo ordenado, que estará a cargo del Director de Reclutamiento del Ejército y del Comandante del Distrito Militar No. 32 de Bucaramanga, bajo el apremio de las sanciones previstas en el Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.