JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 14, 2003

T-387 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Eduardo Arizabaleta Valencia Vs. Iss Cauca Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Vida Salud Debido Proceso E Igualdad. Via De Hecho. Disminucion Pension De Invalidez. Regimen Pensional De Diputados. Regimen De Honorarios Remuneracion Salarial De Prestaciones Sociales Y Seguridad Social. Aplicación Normatividad Vigente O
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Pension De Invalidez De Diputado
  • Aplicación de ley 100 de 1993
Prestaciones Sociales De Diputados
  • Régimen legal y constitucional
Via De Hecho
  • Inexistencia por aplicación indebida de la ley
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida el 4 de diciembre de 2002 por Sala Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia dentro del proceso de tutela instaurado por el senor Eduardo Arizabaleta Valencia contra la Sala Civil Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Distrito Judicial de Popayan - Cauca y el Instituto de Seguros Sociales - Cauca, pero por las razones expresadas en esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.