JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 26, 1993

T-347 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Mario Santander

✓
Topic · hard data
Debido Proceso. Derecho De Propiedad. Actuacion Administrativa. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del 17 de marzo de 1993, proferida por el Juzgado
  4. Séptimo. del Circuito de Pasto, únicamente en cuanto al deber de las autoridades públicas de responder oportuna y diligentemente a las peticiones de los ciudadanos, particularmente cuando dichas solicitudes están reguladas por un procedimiento administrativo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.