JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 17, 1996

T-314 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Orlando Niebles Echeverria

✓
Topic · hard data
Subsidiaridad En La Tutela. Tutela Contra Particulares. Reconocimiento De Pension De Invalidez. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Reconocimiento de pensiones
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR las sentencias proferidas en la presente acción por el Juzgado 12 Civil del Circuito de Barranquilla y la Sala Civil del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de dicha ciudad.
  2. Segundo. Para los efectos del artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, el Juzgado de origen hará las notificaciones y tomará las medidas adecuadas.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.