JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 19, 1998

T-305 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Gabriel Antonio Hoyos Gutierrez

✓
Topic · hard data
Improcedencia De La Tutela Para Determinar La Entidad De Prevision Social A La Cual Corresponde El Reconocimiento Y Pago De Prestaciones Sociales. Medio De Defensa. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia para definir entidad responsable de pensión
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Definición de entidad responsable del pago de pensión
Pension De Jubilacion
  • Improcedencia de tutela para definir entidad responsable del reconocimiento
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. Primero. CONFIRMAR las sentencias proferidas por la Sala de Decision del Tribunal Contencioso Administrativo de Caldas, el 28 de noviembre de 1.997, y por la Seccion Primera de la Sala de lo Contencioso Administrativo del Consejo de Estado, el 29 de enero de 1.998, en el proceso de tutela de la referencia, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  4. Segundo. LIBRESE por Secretaria la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines alli establecidos.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.