JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 9, 2001

T-273 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Jorge Alirio Sanchez Hernandez Vs. Departamento De Santander

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Solicitud Reconocimiento Y Pago Reliquidacion De La Pension De Jubilacion. Omision. Respuesta Oportuna Y De Fondo. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución
  • Resolución oportuna y de fondo
Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Séptimo. Civil del Circuito de Bucaramanga. En su lugar TUTELAR el derecho de petición del cual es titular señor Jorge Alirio Sánchez Hernández.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Gobernación de Santander, representada por el Gobernador del Departamento, que, a mas tardar dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación del presente fallo, si así no lo hubiere hecho, resuelva de fondo, concreta y completamente, sobre la solicitud elevada por el actor.
  4. Tercero. PREVENIR a la entidad demandada para que se apreste a cumplir lo señalado en este fallo, so pena de incurrir en desacato, y para que en lo sucesivo no repita la omisión que dio origen a la presente acción.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.