JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 18, 1998

T-303 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Jose Alberto Ramirez Pinzon

✓
Topic · hard data
Habeas Data. Der. A La Intimidad Y Al Buen Nombre. Termino Para Tener Registrada A Una Persona En Banco De Datos. Sancion Pecuniaria. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Habeas Data
  • Caducidad
  • Rectificación inmediata
  • Términos constituyen pautas jurisprudenciales
  • Alcance
  • No son inmodificables
  • Actualización de informaciones
Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia de sanción pecuniaria por su ejercicio
4 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMASE el fallo proferido en el asunto de la referencia por la Corte Suprema de Justicia -Sala de Casación Civil y Agraria- el 5 de diciembre de 1997, pero sólo en cuanto negó la tutela incoada.
  2. Segundo. REVOCASE la mencionada providencia en cuanto sancionó al accionante con multa de diez salarios mínimos mensuales.
  3. Tercero. El Consejo Superior de la Judicatura reintegrará de inmediato la suma pagada por JOSE ALBERTO RAMIREZ PINZON, si al notificarse este fallo ya se hubiere hecho efectiva la multa.
  4. Cuarto. DESE cumplimiento a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.