JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)June 28, 1996

T-287 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Julio Cesar Ortiz Gutiérrez

✓Claimant Alonso Lozano Chara

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Vida. Debido Proceso. Peligro De Transito Automotriz En Via Residencial. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Particulares
  • Pluralidad de personas identificables
Juez De Tutela
  • Determinación del actor
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Peligrosidad por tránsito vehicular
Acción De Tutela
  • Peligrosidad vía pública
  • Procedencia excepcional tránsito vehicular
Debido Proceso
  • Necesidad de oir al demandado
Derecho A La Vida
  • Tránsito vehicular
Estado
  • Circulación peatones por vías
Municipio
  • Regulación vía pública
8 topics · 9 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del Juzgado
  2. Primero. Civil Municipal de Puerto Tejada (Cauca) que negó por improcedente la acción de tutela ejercida por el señor ALONSO LOZANO CHARA, el día 1 de diciembre de 1995 en contra del Ministerio del Transporte, pero por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  3. Segundo. Líbrense por Secretaría, las comunicaciones a que se refiere el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.