JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 30, 1997

T-274 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Ana De Jesus Acevedo Martinez

✓
Topic · hard data
Reconocimiento Y Pago De Sustitucion Pensional. Tutela Transitoria. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sustitución Pensional
  • Improcedencia de reconocimiento por tutela previamente negada
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. DECISIÓN
  2. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo de segunda instancia proferido por la Sala Laboral del Tribunal Superior de Armenia, en sentencia de 6 de diciembre de 1996. Dentro del proceso de tutela instaurado por la señora Ana de Jesus Acevedo Martínez.
  3. Segundo. LÍBRENSE por la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional, las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.