JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 17, 2004

T-256 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Willian Beetar Ramos Vs Fiscal 4 Delegado Ante Tribunal

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso. Respuesta A Recurso De Apelacion Interpuesto. Dilacion Injustificada Por Carga Laboral. Carencia Actual De Objeto. Hecho Superado. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Mora Judicial
  • Justificación por excesiva carga laboral
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. LEVANTAR los términos suspendidos dentro del trámite de la presente acción de tutela.
  2. Segundo. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida el diez (10) de junio de 2003 por la Sala de Casación Penal de la Corte Suprema de Justicia proferida dentro del trámite de la acción de tutela interpuesta por William Beetar Ramos contra la Fiscalía Cuarta Delegada ante el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Cartagena, mediante la cual se resolvió negar la protección del derecho al debido proceso.
  3. Tercero. DECLARAR la carencia actual de objeto, por existir un hecho superado
  4. Cuarto. ORDENAR que por Secretaría General se dé cumplimiento a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.