JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 26, 2001

T-240 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Maria Del Carmen Lopez Gallego Vs. Prosocial Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Mesadas Pensionales. Concedida
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Empleador
  • Situación económica o presupuestal no es óbice para desconocer pago de mesadas pensionales
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo proferido por la Sala de Familia del Tribunal Superior de Antioquia el 31 de agosto de 2000. En su lugar, TUTELAR el derecho fundamental al minimo vital de la senora Maria del Carmen Lopez Gallego.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR a la Promotora de Vacaciones y Recreacion Social PROSOCIAL, para que dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificacion de la presente sentencia, cancele la totalidad de las mesadas adeudadas a la demandante.
  3. Tercero. El desacato a las ordenes impartidas en esta providencia, se sancionara de conformidad con lo senalado en el articulo 52 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Cuarto. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.