JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 8, 2004

T-221 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Ruth Garzon Astro Vs Coomeva Eps

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Vida Salud Y Seguridad Social. Solicitud Practica De Cirugia Ojo Derecho. Suspendida Por Tejido Corneal Excluido Del Pos. Hecho Superado. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Transplante de cornea
Plan Obligatorio De Salud
  • Interpretación del contenido
  • Se encuentra incluido procedimiento de transplante de cornea
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado dieciseis Civil del Circuito de Bogota en el proceso de la referencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. CONFIRMAR parcialmente la Sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Veinticinco Civil Municipal de Bogota en el proceso de la referencia. REVOCAR el numeral
  3. cuarto. de la mencionada providencia y en su lugar, NO RECONOCER a la E.P.S. Coomeva S.A. el derecho de reclamar ante el FOSYGA el valor de los costos en los que incurra en cumplimiento de la orden dada por el Juzgado.
  4. TERCERO. DENEGAR la solicitud de amparo elevada por la ciudadana Ruth Garzon Castro, en el entendido de que existe un hecho superado.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.