JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 21, 2002

T-217 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Banco Cafetero S.A. Vs. Consejo Superior De La Judicatura

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso. Reliquidacion De Credito. Via De Hecho. Tutela Contra Tutela. Cosa Juzgada Constitucional. Concasa. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones expuestas, la sentencia proferida por la Corte Suprema de Justicia -Sala de Casacion Civil -, por la cual confirma la sentencia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogota, Sala Civil, en el proceso de tutela promovido por el Banco Cafetero S.A. -Bancafe- contra el Consejo Superior de la Judicatura - Sala Jurisdiccional Disciplinaria.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General librense las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 7cited by 17 →T-217/02SU.047/99 — Debido Proceso. Inviolabilidad De Los Congresistas. Incompetencia De La Corte Suprema Para Investigar Los Votos De Los Representantes En El · cited 533 timesSU.047/991999SU.1219/01 — Derechos A La Vida Trabajo Vivienda Subsistencia Debido Proceso Y Defensa. Cambio Turno. Contrato Individual De Trabajo De Medico. Tutela Co · cited 474 timesSU.1219/012001C-747/99 — Dec. 663/93. Arts. 121 Nº1 Y 134 Nº2 Parc. Capitalizacion De Intereses. Inexequible. Ver Sentencia <a Href=../1999/C-700-99.Rtf> C-700/99</A · cited 94 timesC-747/991999C-674/99 — Retencion De Mercancias A Quienes Compran Sin Factura. Dian. · cited 57 timesC-674/991999C-1716/00 — Decreto 2591 De 1991. Art. 32 (P.). Accion De Tutela. Seleccion Para Su Revision. Improcedencia. Exequible. · cited 39 timesC-1716/002000T-068/00 — Tutela Contra Hospital Militar. Desvinculacion Del Cargo Por Cese Ilegal De Actividades. Incidencia De Fallo De Unificacion Jurisprudencial · cited 35 timesT-068/002000T-221/93 — Tutela Contra Sentencias. Debido Proceso. Embargo Y Remate De Un Inmueble Y Creditos Laborales. Concedida. · cited 13 timesT-221/931993SU.055/15 · cited 143 timesSU.055/152015T-684/04 — Derecho A La Libertad Personal Y Al Debido Proceso De Representante Legal De Empresa Contra Quien Se Tramito Incidente De Desacato Por Inc · cited 83 timesT-684/042004T-104/07 · cited 80 timesT-104/072007T-010/12 · cited 49 timesT-010/122012T-272/14 · cited 38 timesT-272/142014T-280/17 — Temeridad En La Accion De Tutela Y La Cosa Juzgada Constitucional. · cited 31 timesT-280/172017T-151/10 · cited 20 timesT-151/102010T-208/13 · cited 18 timesT-208/132013
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.