JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 26, 2000

T-1325 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Mery Fuentes Puentes Vs. Instituto De Seguros Sociales.

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Salud Y Educacion. No Firma Del Pagare Que Garantiza El Pago De La Afiliacion Del Cotizante Dependiente Al Servicio De Salud. Omision De Esta Al No Cumplir Con Un Requisito Obligatorio Para Todos Los Afiliados Lo Que Conlleva A La Suspension Del Tratamiento De Su Hermano. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud
  • Fundamental por conexidad
  • Naturaleza
Entidad Promotora De Salud
  • Requisito de suscripción título valor para afiliaciones adicionales
Regimen Contributivo De Salud
  • Suscripción título valor para afiliaciones adicionales
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo del Juzgado 2 Penal Municipal de Neiva en el proceso de tutela formulado por la senora MERY FUENTES PUENTES en contra del Instituto de Seguros Sociales-Seccional Huila.
  2. Segundo. CONMINAR a la senora MERY FUENTES PUENTES para que proceda a suscribir el pagare y subsane la omision del cumplimiento del deber legal en los terminos previstos en numeral 10deg articulo 2deg del Decreto 047 de 2000, de acuerdo a lo dispuesto en la parte motiva de este fallo.
  3. Tercero. LIBRESE por la Secretaria General de esta Corporacion, la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.