JurídicoESEN
Unification ruling (SU)February 9, 1995Full bench

SU- de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Alvarez Ramirez Maria Elena·Respondent I.S.S.

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Salud. Der. A La Seguridad Social. Cobertura Familiar. E.P.S. Menor Con Enfermedad Incurable. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

5 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (7 points)
  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Revocar la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  4. Sexto. Laboral del Circuito de Medellín, el día 3 de agosto de 1994.
  5. Segundo. Conceder la tutela del derecho constitucional fundamental a la seguridad social y a la salud de la menor hija de la peticionaria, en el asunto de la referencia y en consecuencia, ordenar al Instituto Colombiano de Seguros Sociales, Seccional Antioquia, que proceda a brindar los servicios médico-hospitalarios a la hija menor de la afiliada, María Elena Alvarez Ramírez, de conformidad con lo establecido por la Ley 100 de 1994 y por los Decretos 1298, 1919 y 1938 de 1994.
  6. Tercero. Comunicar lo resuelto en esta providencia al Juzgado
  7. Sexto. Laboral del Circuito de Medellín, para efectos del cumplimiento de la misma, de conformidad con lo dispuesto por el Decreto 2591 de 1991
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.