JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 29, 1993

T-120 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Pinski Y Asociados

✓
Topic · hard data
Concordato Preventivo. Debido Proceso. Pinski. Concedida. Ver Auto 008/93.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santa fe de Bogota, por la cual se denego la tutela solicitada por Pinski & Asociados S.A.
  2. SEGUNDO. CONCEDER la tutela a la sociedad Pinski & Asociados S.A. por las consideraciones antes expuestas.
  3. TERCERO. ORDENAR al Superintendente de Sociedades la inmediata remision del expediente al Juez Civil de Circuito de Cali (reparto) para la calificacion de creditos y para la resolucion de objeciones y la graduacion del proceso concordatario de Pinski & Asociados S.A.
  4. CUARTO. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, ENVIAR copia de esta Sentencia al Superintendente de Sociedades, al Juez
  5. Noveno. Civil del Circuito de Cali, al Tribunal Disciplinario del Valle, al Consejo de Estado y al Defensor del Pueblo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceFabio Morón DíazDissentEduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.