JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 13, 2003

T-1085 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Jose Leal - Gobernador Cabildo Indigena Totarco Tamarindo - Tolima Vs. Secretaria Depertamental De Educacion Y Cultura Del Tolima

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Igualdad Consulta Previa Y Debido Proceso De Resguardo Indigena. Nombramiento De Etnodocentes. Otros Mecanismos De Defensa Judicial. Improcedente. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela Contra Actuaciones Administrativas
  • Casos en que procede
  • Norma en que se encuentra régimen de procedibilidad
Accion De Tutela Frente A Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Improcedencia por no existir perjuicio irremediable
Personal Docente Indigena
  • Nombramiento en establecimientos educativos en resguardos indígenas
3 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Revocar la decisión del Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Civil del Circuito de Ibagué en el sentido de negar la tutela de los derechos fundamentales de la Comunidad Totarco Tamarindo, y en su lugar, declarar improcedente la acción de tutela instaurada por José Leal contra la Secretaría de Educación y Cultura del Tolima, pues existían para el caso otros mecanismos de defensa y no se vislumbró la amenaza de que los intereses de la comunidad Totarco Tamarindo sufriesen un perjuicio irremediable.
  3. Segundo. Librar las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.