JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 7, 2002

T-074 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Hector Naranjo Garcia Vs. Comcel S.A. Cali

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion Y Buen Nombre. Contrato Prestacion De Servicios De Telefonia Movil Celular. Clonacion De Telefono. Facturacion Cuyo Pago Es Obligacion De Orden Patrimonial. Accion De Tutela Contra Particulares. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Particulares
  • Prestación de servicio público domiciliario
Regimen De Libre Y Leal Competencia Economica
  • Servicios no domiciliarios de comunicaciones
Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia para obtener abono y rectificación de sumas por servicio de telefonía móvil celular
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Reclamación por conducta asumida por Comcel
Superintendencia De Industria Y Comercio
  • Régimen de competencia en servicios no domiciliarios de comunicaciones
Telefonia Movil Celular
  • No es servicio público domiciliario
7 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo adoptado por el Juzgado
  2. Septimo. Penal Municipal de Bogota el 21 de agosto de 2001, mediante el cual declaro improcedente la tutela impetrada por el ciudadano HECTOR NARANJO GARCIA contra Comcel S. A.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR que por la Secretaria General de la Corporacion, se libren las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.