JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 16, 2001

T-030 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Ismael Orozco Sanchez Vs. Cajanal Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Pension De Vejez. Iss. Solicitud Emision Bono Pensional. Regimen De Transicion. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Debe instaurarse contra el responsable de la demora en el trámite de la pensión
Derechos Fundamentales
  • Vulneración cuando demora en emisión del bono impide acceso a pensión de jubilación
Entidades Territoriales
  • Pago de pensión cuando no pueda hacerlo el ISS por no expedición del bono pensional
Seguro Social
  • Exigencia de certificación sobre existencia de recursos para pago del bono pensional
  • Pago de pensión una vez sea expedido el bono pensional
Bono Pensional
  • Procedencia de tutela para reclamar la remisión
  • Ultima entidad empleadora reconoce y expide la totalidad
Pension De Jubilacion
  • Tiempos compartidos
6 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado 6deg Penal del Circuito de Bogota, el 27 de junio de 2000 y que ha dado motivo al presente fallo de revision.
  2. SEGUNDO. Por Secretaria librense las comunicaciones previstas en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.