JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 20, 1993

T-029 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Simon Rodriguez Rodriguez

✓Claimant Oscar I. Mariaca

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Igualdad. Proteccion A La Indigencia. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. PRIMERO. Confirmar el fallo proferido por el Tribunal Superior de Medellín, Antioquia, de fecha 9 de agosto de l992, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  4. SEGUNDO. Prevéngase a los señores Alcalde y Secretario de Bienestar Social de Medellín para que suministren la debida asistencia social al señor Oscar Iván Mariaca Correa en el caso de que él la solicite y siempre y cuando que voluntaria y normalmente esté dispuesto a recibirla, o en su defecto lo hagan sus allegados u otras personas que actúen en virtud del principio de solidaridad (art. 1o. C.N.).
  5. TERCERO. Notificar personalmente la presente providencia a los demadantes Manuel Antonio Muñoz Uribe, Jorge Alberto Restrepo M. y al Alcalde y Secretario de Bienestar Social del Municipio de Medellín, por parte del Tribunal Superior de esta ciudad.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.