JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 25, 2000

T-027 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Remberto Leal Torres Perez

✓
Topic · hard data
Tutela Contra Juez Penal Municipal De Cerete (Cordoba). Mora Judicial. Realizacion De Audiencia Publica Y Solicitud De Embargo Y Secuestro De Bienes. Envio De Copias De Lo Actuado En Proceso Penal A Corte Suprema . Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Audiencia Publica
  • No hubo mora judicial
Debido Proceso
  • No vulneración por mora judicial
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por la Sala de Casación Civil y Agraria de la Corte Suprema de Justicia el 18 de agosto de 1999 y, en su lugar, confirmar el fallo adoptado por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Montería el 24 de junio de 1999; en consecuencia, denegar la tutela de los derechos de acceso a la administración de justicia y debido proceso del actor, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. Segundo. Comunicar este fallo al Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura de Montería para lo de su competencia.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaría, líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Comuníquese, notifíquese, cúmplase e
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.