JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 21, 1997

T-002 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Berenice Bermudez Mosquera

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Salud. Der. A La Igualdad. Der. Al Trabajo. Tutela Transitoria. Traslado De Docente Enferma A Otra Escuela Mas Lejana. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Ius Variandi
  • Límites constitucionales
Accion De Tutela Transitoria
  • Traslado docente con limitaciones físicas
Empleador
  • Modificación justificada de condiciones de trabajo
Derecho A La Salud
  • Traslado de docente con limitaciones físicas
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, de fecha 8 de agosto de 1996. En consecuencia se tutelan transitoriamente los derechos a la salud, igualdad y trabajo de la señora Berenice Bermúdez Mosquera, hasta que exista pronunciamiento definitivo de la jurisdicción de lo contencioso administrativo, sobre el decreto 61 de 1995, de la Alcaldía del municipio de Coello, departamento del Tolima.
  2. Segundo. ORDENAR al Alcalde del municipio de Coello, departamento del Tolima, disponer las medidas pertinentes para que la ubicación laboral de la docente no ponga en peligro su salud.
  3. Tercero. COMUNICAR esta decisión al Tribunal Superior de Ibagué, para que sean notificadas las partes, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.