SU- de 2006
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
✓Claimant Edgar Olimpo Liz Chasqui Vs. Cabildo Indigena Del Resguardo De Togoima
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia
- Presentación de varias tutelas por los mismos hechos
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Derecho a la igualdad el debido proceso y el acceso a la administracion de justicia de persona condenada por el gobernador del cabildo indigena de togoima a sesenta (60) años de prision por un delito cometido dentro de la jurisdiccion del resguardo indigena no siendo la autoridad competente para imponer la pena privativa de la libertad.
El accionante ha incoado tres acciones de tutela lo que significa que la presente tutela es improcedente.
El demandante no podia instaurar la accion dado que la misma se habia negado por decision que hizo transito a cosa juzgada.
Rechazada por improcedente
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Primero. Revocar la Sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Promiscuo Municipal de Paez, Cauca el diecinueve (19) de diciembre de 2003, que declaro infundada la accion de tutela instaurada por el senor Edgar Olimpo Liz Chasqui contra el Cabildo Indigena de Togoima.
- Segundo. Rechazar por improcedente la accion de tutela instaurada por el senor Edgar Olimpo Liz Chasqui contra el Cabildo Indigena de Togoima.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.