JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 15, 2001Full bench

C-860 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓
Topic · hard data
Control De Constitucionalidad Del Protocolo De Kyoto De La Convencion Marco De Las Naciones Unidas Sobre El Cambio Climatico
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cambio Climatico Global
  • Países desarrollados y en vía de desarrollo
  • Obligaciones comunes y aplicables a países en vía de desarrollo
Protocolo De Kyoto
  • Obligaciones comunes y aplicables a países en vía de desarrollo
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 629 de 2000.

Protocolo de kyoto de la convencion marco de las naciones unidas sobre el cambio climatico.

Efecto invernadero.

Acciones internacionales.

Obligaciones para los paises industrializados y en via de desarrollo.

Mecanismos de cooperacion financiera

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 629/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLES el "Protocolo de Kyoto de la Convencion Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climatico", hecho en Kyoto el 11 de diciembre de 1997, y la Ley No. 629 del 27 de diciembre de 2.000, que lo aprueba.
  2. Segundo. Comuniquese esta decision al Gobierno Nacional por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Presidencia de la Republica, y enviesele copia autentica de la misma para los efectos constitucionales previstos en el numeral 10 del articulo 241 de la Carta Politica.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.