JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 11, 2001Full bench

C-741 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Hernan Guillermo Aldana Duque

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio Por Ineptitud De Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Contra Norma De La Ley 363 De 1997
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Control De Constitucionalidad
  • No recae sobre prácticas
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Acusación en debida forma
  • Recae sobre todo texto y no deducido o implícito
  • Elementos indispensables
Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Suposición no contenida en norma impugnada
Norma Acusada
  • Formulación de efectos implícitos eventuales no derivados expresamente
  • Generalidad e imprecisión
  • Indeterminación no es razón para inconstitucionalidad
7 topics · 11 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 363 de 1997.

Art 23.

Reforma la ley 132 de 1994.

Estatuto organico de los fondos ganaderos.

Representacion nacional.

Requisitos de las demandas en las acciones publicas de inconstitucionalidad.

Necesidad de presentar una acusacion que pueda predicarse

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 132/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionLey 132/94DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 23Ley 363/97DECLINED TO RULE
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Primero. INHIBIRSE para decidir sobre la constitucionalidad del articulo 23 de la Ley 363 de 1997 por inepta demanda.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.