JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 21, 2000Full bench

C-735 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Jairo Villegas Arbelaez

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Seguridad Social De Empresas Sociales Del Estado
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 100/93.art. 194 y 195.

Prestacion de servicios de salud y su regimen juridico.

Estarse a lo resuelto en la c-408/94

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 100/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 194Ley 100/93ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 195Ley 100/93ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (22 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-408/94, que declaró exequibles los artículos 194 y 195 de la ley 100 de 1993
  4. ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ CABALLERO
  5. Presidente
  6. ANTONIO BARRERA CARBONELL
  7. Magistrado
  8. ALFREDO BELTRAN SIERRA
  9. Magistrado
  10. EDUARDO CIFUENTES MUÑOZ
  11. Magistrado
  12. CARLOS GAVIRIA DIAZ
  13. Magistrado
  14. JOSE GREGORIO HERNANDEZ GALINDO
  15. Magistrado
  16. FABIO MORON DIAZ
  17. Magistrado
  18. VLADIMIRO NARANJO MESA
  19. Magistrado
  20. ALVARO TAFUR GALVIS
  21. Magistrado
  22. MARTHA V. SACHICA DE MONCALEANO
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.