C-668 de 2001
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández
✓Claimant Rafael Sandoval Lopez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Procedencia de casación en penal
- Oportunidad de demanda de casación en penal
- Respuesta inmediata en demanda de casación penal
- Recurso extraordinario
- Distinción
- Concepto
- Sujeción a la Constitución
- Demandada
- No demandantes
- Demandante
- Petrificación
- Alcance
- Concepto
- Lenguaje
- Lenguaje
- Alcance
- Sujeción a la ley
- Lenguaje de la norma
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 600 de 2000.
Codigo de procedimiento penal.
Arts: 205 (p) 210 (p) 211 (p) 213 (p)214 216(p) y 217 (p).
Procedencia de la casacion.
Oportunidad.
Traslado a los no demandantes.
Calificacion de la demanda.
Respuesta inmediata.
Limitacion de la casacion.
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 600/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (5 points)
- Primero. ESTESE a lo resuelto en la sentencia C - 252 de 2001, en la que se hicieron los siguientes pronunciamientos: declarar INEXEQUIBLE la expresion "ejecutoriadas" del inciso
- primero. del articulo 205 de la ley 600 de 2000; declarar INEXEQUIBLES los incisos
- primero. y
- segundo. del articulo 210 de la ley 600 de 2000 y declarar INEXEQUIBLE el articulo 214 de la ley 600 de 2000.
- Segundo. Declarar EXEQUIBLES las expresiones "no demandantes" del articulo 211, "demandante"de los articulos 213 y 216 y "demandada" del articulo 217 de la Ley 600 de 2000.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.