JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 12, 1998Full bench

C-662 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Elson Rafael Rodriguez Beltran

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 23/91. Arts. 2225 Parcial 2728 Parcial 39404142 Y 46. C. De P.L. Art. 50 Parcial. Ley 50/90. Art. 53. Conciliacion Laboral. Poderes Del Juez. Empleados Directivos. Exequible. Inexequible. Inhibitoria.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sindicato
  • Prohibiciones para afiliados que representen al empleador y empleados directivos
3 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2158/48. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 50Decreto 2158/48 «"de primera instancia", la cual se declara INEXEQUIBLE»UPHELD
Art. 53Ley 50/90UPHELD
Art. 22Ley 23/91DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 25Ley 23/91DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 27Ley 23/91DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 28Ley 23/91DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 39Ley 23/91DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 40Ley 23/91DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 41Ley 23/91DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 42Ley 23/91DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 46Ley 23/91DECLINED TO RULE
11 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Declárase INHIBIDA para pronunciarse sobre la constitucionalidad de los artículos 22, 25, 27, 28, 39, 40, 41, 42 y 46 de la Ley 23 de 1.991 por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  4. Segundo. Declárase EXEQUIBLE el artículo 50 del Código Procesal del Trabajo (Decreto 2158 de 1.948), salvo la expresión "de primera instancia", la cual se declara INEXEQUIBLE.
  5. Tercero. Declárese EXEQUIBLE el artículo 53 de la Ley 50 de 1990.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.