JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 5, 2003Full bench

C-657 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Gustavo Pardo Ardila Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 788 De 2002. Arts. 6 Y 7. Adicion Al Estatuto Tributario. Expedicion Normas Tributarias Y Penales Del Orden Nacional Y Territorial. Proceso De Determinacion Del Tributo E Imposicion De Sanciones. Inscripcion Liquidacion Oficial De Revision O Aforo. Im
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Efectos de las decisiones
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 788/02. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 6Ley 788/02ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 7Ley 788/02ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-485 de 2003, que declaro exequible el articulo 6deg de la Ley 788 de 2002 condicionado a que se entienda que la Administracion debe limitar la cuantia del registro, de modo que resulte proporcionada al valor de las obligaciones tributarias determinadas oficialmente, o al valor de la sancion impuesta por ella. Para estos efectos, el valor de los bienes sobre los cuales recae el registro no podra exceder del doble de la deuda mas sus intereses. Si efectuado el avaluo de los bienes, estos excedieren la suma indicada, debera reducirse la medida cautelar hasta dicho valor, oficiosamente o a solicitud del interesado, y exequible el articulo 7o de la Ley 788 de 2002.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.