JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)December 2, 1993Full bench

C-557 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Jorge Luis Pavon

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 50/90. Arts 21 Y 98 Parciales. Dec. 1063/91. Art. 21 Parcial. Dec. 1730/91. Art. 2.1.3.2.14 Parcial. Todo En Materia Laboral. Cosa Juzgada. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 50/90. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 21Ley 50/90ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 98Ley 50/90ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 1Decreto 1730/91UPHELD
Art. 2Decreto 1730/91UPHELD
Art. 21Decreto 1063/91UPHELD
Art. 2.1.3.2.14Decreto 1730/91ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 3Decreto 1730/91UPHELD
Art. 164Decreto 663/93ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
8 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. ESTESE A LO RESUELTO por la Corte Suprema de Justicia en las sentencias números 107 del 12 de septiembre de 1991 y 110 del 19 de septiembre de 1991, en relación con los artículos 21 y 98 de la Ley 50 de 1990.
  2. Segundo. En relación con los parágrafos de los artículos 21 del decreto 1063 de 1991; 2.1.3.2.14 del decreto 1730 de 1991 y 164 del decreto 663 de 1993, ESTESE A LO RESUELTO por la Corte Suprema de Justicia en la sentencia número 110 del 19 de septiembre de 1991, mediante la cual se declararó EXEQUIBLE el artículo 98 de la ley 50 de 1990, norma reproducida sustancialmente en los parágrafos demandados.
  3. Notifíquese, publíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.