JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)December 3, 1997Full bench

C-649 de 1997

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Jose Fernando Castro

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 99/93 Art 5 N°17 Y 18 Parciales Art. 11 Paragrafo 1 Funciones Del Ministerio Del Medio Ambiente. Exequible E Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Parques Naturales
  • Imposibilidad legislativa y administrativa de sustraer áreas
  • Protección constitucional
Propiedad Estatal Sobre Recursos Naturales Renovables
  • Facultad legislativa de establecer reservas
Derecho Al Ambiente Sano
  • Cometido estatal que se cumple con acción legislativa y actividad administrativa
Reserva Forestal
  • Facultad legal para sustraer áreas
7 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 99/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 11Ley 99/93 «parágrafo 1»UPHELD
Art. 5Ley 99/93STRUCK DOWN· phrase
Phrase struck down«"y sustraer" Contenido en el numeral 18»
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLES la expresión "y la evaluación de los estudios de impacto ambiental" del numeral 17 del artículo 5o. y el parágrafo 1º del artículo 11 de la ley 99 de 1993.
  2. Segundo. Declarar INEXEQUIBLE la expresión "y sustraer" empleada en el numeral 18 del art. 5, en cuanto se entiende referida a las áreas que integran el Sistema Nacional de Parques Naturales, y EXEQUIBLE, en cuanto alude a las reservas forestales nacionales.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.