JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 23, 1992

T-566 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Rafael Salas

✓
Topic · hard data
Bienes De Uso Publico. Playas. Ocupacion. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado Promiscuo del Circuito de Bahia Solano (Choco), con las aclaraciones expuestas en esta Sentencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. A traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, ENVIAR copia de esta Sentencia a la Direccion General Maritima y Portuaria, al Departamento Nacional de Planeacion, al Instituto Nacional de los Recursos Naturales Renovables y del Medio Ambiente -INDERENA-, al Instituto Colombiano de la Reforma Agraria -INCORA-, a la Gobernacion del Departamento del Choco, a la Alcaldia del Municipio de Bahia Solano, a COLCIENCIAS, al Instituto de Estudios Ambientales de la Universidad Nacional -IDEA- y a la Division Especial de Corporaciones del Departamento Nacional de Planeacion.
  3. TERCERO. A traves de la Secretaria General ENVIAR copia de esta Sentencia a la Fiscalia de Bahia Solano (Choco) para lo de su competencia.
  4. CUARTO. A traves de la Secretaria General ENVIAR copia de esta Sentencia al Juzgado Promiscuo del Circuito de Bahia Solano (Choco) y al Defensor del Pueblo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.