C-569 de 2003
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
✓Claimant Antonio Eduardo Collazos Bohorquez
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Control no es competencia de la Corte Constitucional
- Control jurídico recae en el Consejo de Estado
- No tiene jerarquía legal
- Argumento claro y concreto
- Cargo no es cierto ni pertinente
- Ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda
- Modificación
- Cargo de la demanda no es pertinente al texto acusado
- Doctrina sobre naturaleza y jerarquía de las leyes marco
- Naturaleza y jerarquía jurídica
- Modificación del régimen para empleados públicos
- Requisito de nombramiento permanente
What it decided
Holdings on Decreto 1661/91. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- R E S U E L V E
- Por las razones expuestas en la parte considerativa de esta providencia, declararse INHIBIDA para emitir pronunciamiento de fondo respecto de los apartes acusados de los articulos 3o y 8o del Decreto 1661 de 1991.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.