JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 25, 2004Full bench

C-517 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Wilson Alfonso Borja Diaz

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional. Exención De Renta Líquida Gravable Generada Por Aprovechamiento De Nuevos Cultivos De Tardío Rendimiento
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Exención de renta líquida gravable generada por aprovechamiento de nuevos cultivos de tardío rendimiento
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 818 de 2003.

Arts. 3 4 5 6 y 7.

Renta liquida gravable por aprovechamiento de cultivos de tardio rendimiento.

Exension tributaria.

Cosa juzgada constitucional.

Estese a lo resuelto en c-370/04

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 818/03. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 3Ley 818/03ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 4Ley 818/03ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 5Ley 818/03ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 6Ley 818/03ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 7Ley 818/03ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
5 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-370 de 2004 que declaro la INEXEQUIBILIDAD de los articulos 3o, 4o, 5o, 6o, y 7o de la Ley 818 de 2003 objeto de acusacion en el presente proceso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.