C-511 de 1992
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
✓Claimant Robinson Rada
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Modificación
- Vigencia
- Límites
- Vulneración
- Expedición de normas
What it decided
Holdings on Decreto ley 2250/91. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (14 points)
- En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional,
- R E S U E L V E
- PRIMERO. Declarase inconstitucional el Decreto ley 2250 de 1991, "Por el cual se modifica el Decreto 1751 de 1991".
- SEGUNDO. Ordenase al Gobierno habilitar un termino de veintinueve (29) dias calendario, equivalente al mismo que los tenedores de vehiculos dejaron de gozar a raiz de la expedicion del Decreto 2250 de 1991, para los efectos de lo previsto en los articulos 1o y siguientes del Decreto ley 1751 de 1991. El Gobierno debera establecer los requisitos, procedimientos y demas cautelas necesarias para evitar que personas diferentes a las originalmente amparadas por la norma de saneamiento, se favorezcan con la misma.
- SIMON RODRIGUEZ RODRIGUEZ
- Presidente
- CIRO ANGARITA BARON EDUARDO CIFUENTES MUNOZ
- Magistrado Magistrado
- JOSE GREGORIO HERNANDEZ ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ CABALLERO
- FABIO MORON DIAZ JAIME SANIN GREIFFENSTEIN
- Aclaracion de voto-
- MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA DE MONCALEANO
- Secretaria General
- La suscrita
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.