JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 3, 1992Full bench

C-511 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Robinson Rada

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 2250/91. Modifica El Dec. 1751/91. Facultades Extraordinarias Para El Saneamiento Aduanero. Inconstitucional
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

7 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto ley 2250/91. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1oDecreto ley 2250/91STRUCK DOWN
Phrase struck down«Por el cual se modifica el Decreto 1751 de 1991»
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (14 points)
  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. PRIMERO. Declarase inconstitucional el Decreto ley 2250 de 1991, "Por el cual se modifica el Decreto 1751 de 1991".
  4. SEGUNDO. Ordenase al Gobierno habilitar un termino de veintinueve (29) dias calendario, equivalente al mismo que los tenedores de vehiculos dejaron de gozar a raiz de la expedicion del Decreto 2250 de 1991, para los efectos de lo previsto en los articulos 1o y siguientes del Decreto ley 1751 de 1991. El Gobierno debera establecer los requisitos, procedimientos y demas cautelas necesarias para evitar que personas diferentes a las originalmente amparadas por la norma de saneamiento, se favorezcan con la misma.
  5. SIMON RODRIGUEZ RODRIGUEZ
  6. Presidente
  7. CIRO ANGARITA BARON EDUARDO CIFUENTES MUNOZ
  8. Magistrado Magistrado
  9. JOSE GREGORIO HERNANDEZ ALEJANDRO MARTINEZ CABALLERO
  10. FABIO MORON DIAZ JAIME SANIN GREIFFENSTEIN
  11. Aclaracion de voto-
  12. MARTHA VICTORIA SACHICA DE MONCALEANO
  13. Secretaria General
  14. La suscrita
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.