JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 5, 2000Full bench

C-386 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Benjamin Ochoa Moreno

✓
Topic · hard data
Subordinacion Del Trbajador En Contrato De Trabajo. No Afectación Honor, Dignidad Y Derechos Mínimos Del Trabajador En Concordancia Con Tratados
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Subordinacion Del Trabajador En Contrato De Trabajo
  • Reglas atendiendo la Constitución
  • Ejercicio de poderes por empleador obliga acatar derechos de trabajadores reconocidos en Constitución y fuentes formales
  • No afectación de derechos del trabajador en concordancia con tratados
  • Límites a poderes del empleador
Contrato De Trabajo
  • Subordinación laboral
  • Elementos esenciales
Ius Variandi
  • Alcance y límites
3 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 50/90.

Art. 1 lit.

B parcial.

Elementos esenciales para que haya contrato de trabajo.

Exequible la expresion "minimos".

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 50/90. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1Ley 50/90 «literal b»UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declarar exequible la expresión "mínimos" contenida en el literal b) del artículo 1 de la ley 50 de 1990, bajo los condicionamientos señalados en el numeral 2.4 de la parte motiva de esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.