JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 25, 1994Full bench

C-370 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 1185/94. Se Dictan Normas Sobre Apropiacion Por Via Administrativa. Conmocion. Exequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Expropiacion Por Via Administrativa
  • Carácter reservado del avalúo
  • Competencia para fijar procedimiento
  • Emergencia por desbordamiento
  • Motivos
  • Efectividad
Expropiacion
  • Competencia para adquirir inmuebles
  • Límites al control judicial
9 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1185/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto 1185/94UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el Decreto 1185 de junio 14 de 1994, salvo las expresiones contenidas en el artículo 2o. que dicen "...y a las demás entidades públicas, a las cuales corresponde desarrollar proyectos en las zonas de desastre, riesgo e influencia.", que se declaran inexequibles de acuerdo con lo establecido en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
DissentFabio Morón DíazDissentEduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.