JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 19, 1994

T-242 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Luz Marina Henao

✓
Topic · hard data
Libertad Personal. Habeas Corpus. Servicio Militar Obligatorio. Libertad Provisional. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la Sentencia proferida por el Juzgado 2o Promiscuo Territorial de Saravena -Arauca-, teniendo en cuenta los considerandos de este fallo.
  2. SEGUNDO. En consecuencia, DENEGAR la accion de tutela interpuesta por Luz Marina Henao Lopera contra el Juzgado 124 de Instruccion Penal Militar, el Ministerio de Defensa Nacional y el Grupo Mecanizado de Caballeria No. 19 del Ejercito Nacional, por las razones expuestas en esta sentencia.
  3. TERCERO. COMUNICAR a traves de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional el contenido de la sentencia al Juzgado 2o Promiscuo Territorial de Saravena -Arauca-, al Juzgado 124 de Instruccion Penal Militar, al Ministerio de Defensa Nacional, al Grupo Mecanizado de Caballeria No. 19 del Ejercito Nacional, al Defensor del Pueblo y a la peticionaria de la presente tutela.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.