JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 8, 1998Full bench

C-339 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Maria Teresa Garces Lloreda

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 48/93. Art 1014 Paragrafo 1 Y Art 20 Paragrafo. Mandato Por La Paz. Mayoria De Edad Para El Servicio Militar. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Vida Del Menor Adulto
  • Envío a zonas de combate
Mandato Por La Paz
  • Carácter imperativo
  • Naturaleza
  • No cumple exigencias que regulan el Cabildo Abierto
  • No cumple exigencias que regulan la consulta popular
  • No tiene valor político
  • Finalidad
  • No cumple exigencias que regulan el plebiscito
  • No cumple exigencias que regulan el Referendo
  • No cumple exigencias que regulan la Asamblea Constituyente
  • No es Acto Legislativo
Servicio Militar Por Menor De Edad
  • Prohibición absoluta
  • Prohibición de participación en conflictos armados
5 topics · 14 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 48/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 1Ley 48/93UPHELD
Art. 10Ley 48/93UPHELD
Art. 14Ley 48/93UPHELD
Art. 20Ley 48/93 «parágrafo»UPHELD
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. R E S U E L V E :
  2. Primero. Declarar EXEQUIBLE en los terminos de esta sentencia, el paragrafo del articulo 20 de la Ley 48 de 1993, que prescribe: "...salvo las excepciones establecidas en la presente ley para los bachilleres."
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
DissentAlejandro Martínez CaballeroDissentJosé Gregorio Hernández Galindo
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.