JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 11, 2003Full bench

C-208 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Alejandro Ramelli Arteaga Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 179 De 1994. Art. 67 (P.). Decreto 111 De 1996. Art. 27 (P.). Exclusion De Rentas Contractuales. Ley Organica Del Presupuesto. Clasificacion Ingresos Corrientes. Tributarios Y No Tributarios. Impuestos Directos E Indirectos. Tasas Y Multas. Omision Re
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Cargo específico por omisión relativa del legislador
Rentas Contractuales
  • Clasificación autónoma
  • Controversia sobre la exclusión como clasificación autónoma
Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Pérdida de vigencia y no producción de efectos
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 38/89. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 67Ley 179/94DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 27Decreto 111/96 «parcial.»UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. INHIBIRSE para pronunciarse de fondo sobre el artículo 67 de la Ley 179 de 1994.
  2. Segundo. Declarar EXEQUIBLE la expresión "los ingresos no tributarios comprenderán las tasas y las multas", contenida en el artículo 27 del Decreto 111 de 1996, pero sólo por el cargo analizado en esta sentencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.