JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 4, 1998Full bench

C-057 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Carlos Gaviria Díaz

✓Claimant Roberto Bornacelli

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 200/95. Art. 94 Parcial. Codigo Disciplinario Unico. Ejecucion De La Sancion. Exequible E Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Funcionario Y Empleado De La Rama Judicial
  • Poder disciplinario preferente de Procuraduría o Consejo Superior
Procurador General De La Nacion
  • Excepciones al ejercicio del poder disciplinario preferente
  • Ejercicio del poder disciplinario preferente
Consejo Superior De La Judicatura
  • Competencia preventiva en materia disciplinaria
Codigo Disciplinario Unico
  • Contratistas no son destinatarios
Sancion Disciplinaria
  • Competencia para hacerla efectiva
5 topics · 6 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 200/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 94Ley 200/95STRUCK DOWN
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLES los incisos primero, segundo, tercero, cuarto,
  4. quinto. salvo la expresión "y de los contratos de prestación de servicios" que se declara INEXEQUIBLE, sexto,
  5. séptimo. y
  6. octavo. del artículo 94 de la Ley 200 de 1995.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.