C-008 de 2002
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández
✓Claimant Ovidio Ariza Ballen
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Requisitos mínimos
- Argumentación concreta
- Acusación fundada en razones legales
- Requisitos de los cargos de inconstitucionalidad
- Formulación aparente de cargos
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 142 de 1994.
Art. 96 (p.).
Servicios publicos domiciliarios.
Otros cobros tarifarios por reconexion y reinstalacion.
Pago intereses de mora.
Imposicion de multas o sanciones.
Ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda.
Falta de concepto.
Inhibida.
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 142/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- RESUELVE:
- Declararse INHIBIDA para decidir de fondo sobre la constitucionalidad del articulo 96 de la Ley142 de 1994, por carecer la demanda del concepto de la violacion constitucional.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.