JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 7, 2002

T-955 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Carlos Augusto Torres Hurtado Vs. Carlos Alberto Alzate Morales Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Debido Proceso. Via De Hecho. Proceso Ejecutivo Con Pagare Suscrito En Concesion De Credito A Directores Accionistas Y Administradores. Pago Del Capital Suscrito Y No Pagado Sin Necesidad De Requerimiento. Principio De Autonomia E Incorporacion
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Compañia En Liquidacion
  • Relación comercial y no laboral entre entidad y su presidente al otorgar crédito
Via De Hecho En Proceso Ejecutivo
  • Inexistencia
  • Requerimiento de pago
Titulos Valores Autonomos
  • Exigibilidad de la obligación
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida el 6 de junio de 2002 por la Sala de Casación Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, que a su vez confirmó la sentencia del 6 de mayo de 2002 proferida por la Sala de Casación Civil y Agraria de esa Corporación. En consecuencia, se niega el amparo constitucional solicitado por el señor Carlos Augusto Torres Hurtado.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaría General líbrense las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.