JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 25, 1999

T-839 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Constanza Mesa Cepeda

✓
Topic · hard data
Der A La Vida. Der A La Salud. Integridad Fisica. Der A Tener Una Familia. Menor Por Traslado De Su Madre. Tutela Contra Fiscalia Niña Con Sindrome. Ver <a Href=../1994/T-447-94.Rtf> T-447/94</A><a Href=../1999/T-353-99.Rtf> T-353/99</A>. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Salud Del Niño
  • Protección frente acto que ordena traslado de trabajador
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Legalidad de traslado de trabajador
Ius Variandi
  • Discrecionalidad limitada de la administración para modificar sitio de trabajo
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. Primero. CONFIRMAR en todas sus partes la Sentencia del 21 de abril de 1999, dictada por la Corte Suprema de Justicia en el proceso de tutela incoado por la señora Constanza Mesa Cepeda en representación de su hija, Diana Catalina Charry Mesa, en contra de la Fiscalía General de la Nación, Dirección Seccional de Santa Rosa de Viterbo.
  4. Segundo. Por la Secretaría General de la Corte Constitucional, DESE cumplimiento a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.