JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 5, 2000

T-826 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Armando Aldana Mayoga Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital Y Al Trabajo. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Ese. Instituto De Salud De Bucaramanga. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
Empleador
  • Falta de presupuesto o insolvencia para pago oportuno de salarios no es razón suficiente
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR los fallos proferidos por los Juzgados
  2. Quinto. Penal Muncipal y
  3. Cuarto. Penal del Circuito de Bucaramanga. En su lugar, CONCEDER la protección del derecho al mínimo vital de Armando Aldana Mayorga, Adela Chaparro Villamizar, Elsa María Meneses García y Nubia Amaya Gutiérrez.
  4. Segundo. ORDENAR al Gerente de la E.S.E. Instituto de Salud de Bucaramanga que en el término de quince (15) días siguientes a la notificación de la presente providencia, si ya no lo hubiere hecho, cancele los salarios adeudados a Armando Aldana Mayorga, Adela Chaparro Villamizar, Elsa María Meneses García y Nubia Amaya Gutiérrez.
  5. Tercero. Por Secretaría líbrese la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.