JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 2, 2001

T-819 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Javier Gomez Correa Vs. Julian Gutierrez Arango·Respondent Sin Información

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital Y Subsistencia. Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Mesadas Pensionales. Tutela Contra Particulares. Legitimidad Por Pasiva. Existencia De Otro Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia por falta de legitimación por pasiva
  • Improcedencia por no afectación del mínimo vital
Legitimacion Por Pasiva En Tutela
  • Identificación del demando
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Pago oportuno de mesadas pensionales
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido el ocho (8) de mayo de dos mil uno (2001), por el Juzgado 15 Penal Municipal de Cali, dentro de la accion de tutela instaurada por el senor Javier Gomez Correa contra Julian Gutierrez Arango, por medio del cual, se nego el derecho pretendido por el actor, segun las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de este fallo.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, librense las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.