JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 3, 2009

T-782 de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Jose Ernesto Guevara Pinzon·Respondent Cajanal

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Regimen De Transicion En Pensiones De Empleados De La Rama Judicial Y Ministerio Publico
  • Desconocimiento vulnera el derecho a la seguridad social en conexidad con el derecho fundamental al debido proceso y con los derechos adquiridos
Reliquidacion De Pensiones
  • Requisitos que deben acreditarse para que proceda tutela transitoria
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Debido proceso, igualdad, dignidad humana.

El actor solicita el reajuste de su mesada pensional ya que la entidad accionada se niega a reconocer el régimen especial de empleados y funcionarios de la rama judicial.

La Sala pasa a estudiar, la procedencia excepcional de la acción de tutela para la liquidación de pensiones, sí la entidad accionada vulnero el debido proceso del actor al dejar de aplicar el régimen pensional que le correspondía, se encuentra que los derechos fundamentales del accionante han sido vulnerados ya que se le aplicó una normatividad que no era pertinente para el caso, se decide conceder la acción como mecanismo transitorio de protección.

Concedida. <br>

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la decision proferida el 20 de mayo de 2009 por la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogota D.C.
  2. Segundo. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.